I reread Ongoingness today. It is such a lovely little book. It is a reflection on writing, time, and memory and forgetfulness. On the surface Manguso writes about her obsessively keeping a diary for 25 years. While doing so ,she talks about what it means to exist in time “with each recollection, the memory of it further degrades.” And that we forget, or perhaps not notice, the vast majority of the life we live. No matter how hard we try to document each moment. Well worth reading multiple times.
The Needle’s Eye has been on my list of possible choices for RFB for several years, because I wanted to have someone to talk to about it. I have read at it off and on over the years. I started over a couple of days ago; I finished reading it today. The label the publisher gave it is essay/poetry. I can go along with that since it is a hybrid of the two. The “essay” parts are poetic, while the poems often provide examples/commentary on the “essay” parts. I would say it is one long poem made up of essayistic sections and verse. All of it connected in an associative melding of tropes and imagistic repetition.
. Howe uses the two boys in the Boston marathon bombings, Sts.Francis and Clare, various film makers, and her own life to talk about the creation of reality through memory, story (fairy tales), history, legend, and personal narrative. I will read it again (it is short 120 pages) before RFB meets in August. I can see reading it again years from now. She ends the book with a quote from St. Francis—What we are looking for is what is looking.
Here are some other quotes from the book: “We keep adapting to whatever we ourselves invented.”
“I think black-and-white film is closer to personal memory than it is to our dreams.”
“Suffering is actually jewel, precious and personal. Some might even say that it holds up the heavens with its radiance.”
“To the human brain, a hallucination is the exact same thing as seeing the world just as it is.”
Around 5 years ago I was lucky enough to attend a week long seminar in teaching poetry put on by the Poetry Foundation in Chicago. (Thanks again to the Ann Richards Foundation for the airfare). While there we were brought to the Poetry Foundation’s poetry Library. They have the largest collection of poetry anywhere, housing over 30,000 volumes of poetry. It was overwhelming, especially because we were only there for about an hour. I browsed the upstairs shelves pulling one book after another, and reading a poem or two, then writing down the title and author if I was struck for some reason during my quick evaluation. One of the books I found on the shelves was Nelly Sachs’ Glowing Enigma. I added it to my list of books I wanted to read, then pulled another book off the shelf. The following Christmas, Lisa gave me most of the books on the list that I made in Chicago.
A few days ago, while cleaning off my book shelves, I found Glowing Enigma again. This time I read the whole poem. It is a beautiful book, strange and enigmatic (surprise! from the title). Sachs was a friend of Paul Celan, the Romanian poet who survived Auschwitz and wrote hermitic poems that are difficult to glean meaning from (at least for me), but are always worth the effort. Sachs is similar to Celan in that aspect. I am glad I found Glowing Enigma again. It was a beautiful book, filled with strangely lovely poems (or sections of a longer poem, what would you call those?) Here is one example: